A MOTHER and daughter have been ordered to pay more than £600,000 after they were convicted of running an illegal puppy farm in Hampshire
The pair appeared in court after demands to purchase a £265 licence for their operation had been ignored.
Lucinda and Victoria Rolph advertised more than 190 litters of puppies for sale, as well as adult dogs, with some priced at as much as £1,500 each.
Experts say if all the dogs were sold as advertised, the pair could have fetched up to £1.5 million over five years.
But council chiefs caught wind of the pair’s unlicensed operation.
Licensing chiefs visited Lucinda Rolph’s £600,000 farm, near Fair Oak, and warned her that she needed a licence for the commercial breeding of dogs.
However Southampton Crown Court heard that the pair continued to advertise dogs and puppies for sale, sometimes under different names, without a licence.
They came to the attention of licensing chiefs again after a miniature Dachshund they sold died weeks later of Canine parvovirus – which can be prevented through vaccinations.
Now Lucinda Rolph has been ordered to pay £600,000 through a court confiscation order after pleading guilty to running an unlicensed dog breeding farm.
Her 30-year-old daughter, Victoria, who also pleaded guilty to running an unlicensed dog breeding farm, with a lesser role, has been ordered to pay almost £15,000.
The court heard the farm was housed at 52-year-old Lucinda Rolph’s property in Alma Lane, Upham, between 2013 and 2018.
Prosecutor Ethu Crorie said the pair would advertise puppies and adult dogs for sale online via Pets4Homes and Preloved.
Mr Crorie told the court that the pair advertised 38 different breeds, with prices ranging from £500 to £1,500 per animal.
He told the court the pair had several accounts in their own names and 18 with other people’s names – some of whom they knew and were unaware that their name was being used.
Mr Crorie said that if every dog had sold as advertised and none of the adverts were duplicated, the pair could have been paid as much as £1.5 million pound.
He told the court that a warrant was carried out at the puppy farm in May 2015 and licensing officers found litters of puppies as well as adult dogs.
Mr Crorie added there was no records of sales or receipts and the pair did not have any tax records.
In mitigation, Jonathan Underhill said that both Rolphs stressed that there had “never been any suggestion of mistreatment” of the animals.
Mr Underhill said: “But for the licence the whole operation would have been legal.”
He said that a licence for dog breeding from Winchester City Council cost £265.
Mr Underhill added that legislation for dog breeding had recently changed, limiting the punishment for such offences to a fine, and urged Judge Peter Henry to limit the number of unpaid hours the pair faced.
In sentencing, Judge Henry, said: “Lucinda Rolph was warned of the need for having a licence in 2015.
“She said at that stage she was thinking about giving everything up.
“She was well aware a licence was required.
“She kept no records of this lucrative business and they used fake names to hide the fact they were still selling adult and puppies during this period.”
Lucinda Rolph, of Alma Lane, Upham, was ordered to pay £601,700 within a three month period of face a five-year prison sentence in default.
She was also ordered to pay costs of £20,000 and ordered to complete 60 hours of unpaid work.
Victoria Rolph, 30, also of Alma Lane, Upham, was ordered to pay £14,950 within a three month period of face six month in prison in default.
She was also ordered to complete 60 hours of unpaid work.
Both Rolphs were also given a dog breeding banning order for six years.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel