AFTER 19 hours of deliberations plans to expand the runway at Southampton Airport have been given the green light.
Twenty-two councillors voted in favour of the proposals to expand the runway by 164m.
Thirteen councillors voted against the plans and one abstained.
It comes as all councillors at Eastleigh Borough Council spent 19 hours debating the proposals and listening to both sides of the argument.
Over the past two days hundreds of people watched the online debate over the plans that have literally divided public opinion.
On the one hand, campaigners and some residents called for the plans to be refused on the grounds of climate change, noise and pollution.
The longer runway will mean bigger, noisier planes approaching the airport from the north over villages such as Colden Common and Twyford.
On the other hand, residents and the local business community asked for the plans to be approved saying the move would boost the local economy and create new jobs.
Several residents and councillors raised concerns over the impact the runway extension would have on noise and climate change.
It comes as it was previously revealed that the number of people affected by noise would go from 11,450 in 2020 to 46,050 in 2033, if the expansion went ahead.
But officers said the mitigation measures proposed - including insulation and a cap on vehicles to restrict passengers to 3m per annum - would result in a "moderate adverse impact".
In the 19-hour long debate councillors were also told that the expansion would create more than 1,000 jobs, boost the local economy and result in a £15m investment.
More than 200 people had registered to speak at the meeting and made their point perfectly clear.
Tonight several councillors acknowledged they were faced with a difficult decision.
Cllr Margaret Atkinson, leader of the Conservative Group, said: "The decision the council takes on this application is probably the most important it ever takes as it will shape the future of the borough and of its residents for generations to come."
Cllr Wayne Irish added: "This has been probably the most difficult planning application for me in all my 39 years as a councillor on this council."
A number of councillors said they couldn't support the plans and raised concerns over the impact of the runway expansion on climate change and noise.
Cllr Louise Parker-Jones said: "I am not reassured there are the right mitigation processes in place. I really fear for Eastleigh, I really fear why this has been pushed through so so quickly. There is no planet B."
Cllr Tina Campbell added: "We are in a climate emergency. We can support people get another job. There isn't another planet. We have to prioritise climate emergency."
Southampton Airport bosses said they would have to face difficult decisions if the plans were going to be rejected.
Steve Szalay, operations director at the airport, said: "It's a very divisive issue. This is our plan to adapt, to make sure we become a viable business again. We cannot sustain loss of £8m a year. There's no maths that suggest the airport will be ok.
"There's nobody here denying a climate emergency. With a sound economy we can find a technological solution which would decarbonise the country. Back the airport, back the development of green technology. You tonight hold the keys to thousands of jobs.
"A vote for the runway extension secures our future, it secures current jobs, it creates more jobs."
During the debate councillors were also told that the airport is a lifeline for residents in the Channel Islands.
Talking at the end of the debate, Cllr Keith House, leader of Eastleigh Borough Council, asked councillors to approve the proposals.
It was just past 2.15am today (Saturday April 10) when 22 councillors voted in favour of the plans, 13 against and one abstained.
- Comments have been frozen on this article due to some readers abusing others. This will not be tolerated.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel