PLANNERS in the New Forest have rejected a church extension scheme that has split a local community.
An application to build a chapel beside St John the Baptist Church, Burley, was thrown out at a meeting of New Forest District Council's planning committee.
Members heard that the £75,000 scheme had divided villagers, some of whom felt it would spoil the appearance of the Grade II listed building.
A report to councillors said the proposed extension aimed to improve provision for churchgoers.
However, it said the chapel would have a "dramatic impact" on the western elevation of the church and would harm the overall character of the building.
The committee heard from the vicar of St John's, the Rev Diane Webster. She said: "We've held three public meetings and alterations have been made in response to
concerns, but few people have given us any real reason for their objections - other than a dislike of any change.
"I passionately believe in the need for this chapel, which would enable the church to continue to grow."
The committee also heard from an objector, Jeanne Wilde, who said the chapel would partly obscure three of the church's stained glass windows. She added: "So many people in the village believe this extension is not necessary and maintain there are adequate facilities in the church room.
"The church has stood for more than 160 years and the front of the building is so important to Burley residents.
"It has a simple and pleasing aspect that blends into its setting. It's perfect for its
surrounding, and putting something in front of the church would spoil it."
Committee vice-chairman Ann Drake said some Burley residents had objected to the scheme while others had voiced strong support.
Forest North member David Scott said the application should be approved.
He said: "This is a Victorian church and the Victorian Society has taken a favourable approach. The chapel is needed - and the case for it has been well put."
However, a proposal to reject the scheme was passed by nine votes to six.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article