I've learnt with concern about the recent life jail terms imposed on the four men convicted of the failed terror attacks in London on July 21, 2005.

The argument of the judge, referring to the possible number of victims in a real terrorist attack, is not valid, since the horrible event didn't take place A distinction should be made between a terror attack that took place and a failed attempt, which caused no victims.

Ignoring this principle is a violation of fundamental human rights, on the grounds of discrimination or unequal treatment, since the length of their conviction is as long, or longer, than real killers.

This verdict is a result of common British law (and contrary to a number of European and international countries, which do make the distinction between crime and attempt).

Defendants accused of attempted murder of a non-terrorist character, can also be sentenced to ife imprisonment.

I hope British law will be revised to maked a distinction, in punishment, between an attempt and a murder.

ASTRID ESSED, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.